Dear Friends,
Here's what SAG's Theatrical contract vote comes down to for me:
SAG is saddled with being last in line with an out of sync contract with no real leverage for the big changes some insist we need in "new media." The time to muster the troops on this was over a year ago, not now. This particular battle for SAG was over last year when SAG and AFTRA went their separate ways and all the other unions did their deals first. Sadly, SAG cannot realistically fight and win this battle on its own. This is why a "no" vote makes no sense to me.
A "no" vote will mean more new work continuing to go to AFTRA, as we've seen in cable and in animation v.o. over the past year (e.g. all new animated pilots and series at Disney, Cartoon Network and Fox are now AFTRA, as far as I can tell, for the first time). It will be increasingly difficult to qualify for SAG health benefits as this continues. SAG needs a contract now.
The "no" vote advocates offer no plan to make a rejection of this contract work to our advantage. A rejection of this contract isn't a strike authorization, which would have to be a separate vote. Consider this: If members support a "no" vote (50% + to approve) but don't support a strike authorization (75% approval required) SAG would really be sunk. No contract, no sync and no bargaining chip at all. It would be a crowning humiliation for SAG after a humiliating year. Personally, I don't think a strike authorization at SAG is at all possible in this economic climate. But even if a strike authorization did pass, a successful strike still wouldn't help, as all the work would still go to the contract already set by AFTRA (a tweak of the DGA and WGA deals). A "no" vote would only make a bad year for SAG even worse (and a good year for AFTRA even better). There is no exit strategy from a "no" vote.
The contract that SAG's new national board majority recommends offers two years of decent "old media" bumps and a jurisdictional foothold in "new media." The terms for "new media" (in line with what other unions have) are unimpressive at best, but I feel it's the best we can do for now. The video industry is scrambling to avoid what happened to the music industry: Studios are struggling to find profit in "new media" as they continue to cut budgets and staffs. New media profits are not replacing old media profits by a long shot, but "old media" is not going away and is in some ways apparently bolstered by "new media" exposure. Piracy is a big issue, though "Batman Returns" made over a $1 billion world-wide despite early releases of it on file sharing sites. Yes, it would be nice to preemptively set fair terms for "new media" before workable profit models are established rather than after (see cable and DVD's)-- I just don't see how SAG can in any way do that ALONE at this stage and with no clear path to profits yet set.
One of the biggest plusses of SAG's contract is that negotiators were able to re-sync SAG's theatrical contract with AFTRA's (as well as other unions) for two years from now. That may well be lost if this is voted down, which again would be terrible for SAG. My hope for any significant changes is in two years-- if our unions either merge or at least work together by then (like they just did on our commercial contract). That hopeful possibility will probably hinge on upcoming elections. If this contract is voted down, or our unions fail to work together again, we can forget about anything more than tweaks.
I respect other views on this, and I do believe both sides are sincere in their motivation, but there are those among the "no" voters who over-dramatize this contract as the biggest threat to the future of professional performers. I think that is completely inaccurate. Our biggest threat is that we have two unions when we need only one. This ballot along with the past couple years of union wrangling make a compelling case for that fact.
I've been following Hollywood's "digital shift" with my blog for a good while. Believe me, I want better, and I believe that both sides on this do as well, but the only realistic path I see to that is by voting "yes."
Please read all materials carefully, consider all sides, and vote soon. If you need to request a replacement ballot, call SAG Membership Dept. at 323-549-6458 or email at replacementballot@sag.org by Friday, June 5th at noon.
Ballots are due back June 9th.
Thanks,
Dee